 |
| Supreme Court says Nopur Sharma provoked people's emotions (photo: getty images) |
India's Supreme Court has pardoned Nopur Sharma, a suspended member of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), for uttering obscene words about the Prophet of Islam, directly responsible for the country's tensions. Instructed to ask.
According to NDTV, the judges remarked during the hearing on Nopor Sharma's request to consolidate the FIRs registered across the country in one city.
From what is happening in the country. He is the only one responsible for this. ”It may be recalled that last month, Nopur Sharma had made such remarks in a televised debate after which violent protests had started in India, while India was also facing difficulties at the diplomatic level.
Justice Surya Kant said, "We saw how he provoked the emotions. It is a shame for him to call himself a lawyer. He should apologize to the whole country."
Referring to the threats, Nopur Sharma had requested that the FIRs registered in his various areas be transferred to Delhi, but he later accepted the application.
His lawyer told the court that he had filed the application due to the threats. I did not use the name Nopur, to which the judges said, "They have threats or they have become a security threat themselves."
 |
| violent protests erupted in various parts of India after Nopur Sharma's statement (photo: Reuters) |
The court struck down her lawyer on a point raised in Nopur Sharma's plea, which called for "equal treatment" and avoidance of "discriminatory behavior".
If you file an FIR against others, they are arrested immediately, but when they are against you, no one can even dare to touch you, ”the court said. The words show his arrogant attitude.
"The judges said:" What if he is a party spokesman? What do you think? Can? '
 |
| Nopur Sharma had applied to the Supreme Court to consolidate the FIRs registered in different parts of the country into one city (photo: AFP) |
Nopur Sharma's lawyer said she was answering only one question that the anchor had asked during the debate.
Referring to the freedom of expression, the judges said, "Everyone has the right to speak in a democracy."
In a democracy, the grass has the right to grow and the donkey has the right to eat.
When they make irresponsible statements without thinking about the fabric of society.
The necklace that was torn apart by the partition of India and Pakistan
0 Comments