How old is the history of slavery in India?

How old is the history of slavery in India?
(Image source: Getty Images)


The way history is being distorted these days is nothing new in history.

Now that they (Hindu nationalists) have a government, they want to present history in their own way. No history left. It has become a kind of myth. Those who distort history and misrepresent it want to do two more things. 

One is to call Indian culture the oldest. Arya's theory has been rejected in the world but here it is being acknowledged that Arya left India and we discovered everything first. Prime Minister Narendra Modi also seems to be saying that the elephant head of Ganesh (Hindu deity) shows that organ transplants were performed in ancient India.

Such was the attitude of the Nazis, who claimed that the Aryans had left Germany. The Nazis are being imitated in India in exactly the same way that the Aryans from India taught civilization to the whole world.

They date the beginning of the period of slavery in India as 700 AD to 1200 years of Muslim slavery and then to the British. These people do not see that if one has lived in India for many generations, he cannot be called the ruler of any other country. The wealth of the country did not go out during his rule as it was drained of wealth during the British rule. Many English economists agree.

These people combine the rule of Britain and the Muslim rulers. Their purpose in doing so was that they had no support in the movement for independence from the British, so they extended the period of one and a half hundred years of slavery to 1200. Doing so has two benefits for those who distort history. One of them is that they succeed in creating an atmosphere against Muslims.

Secondly, their role in the freedom movement is being covered up. He does not have a single hero in the national movement. Sometimes they adopt Sardar Patel, sometimes Bhagat Singh, but what do they have to do with Bhagat Singh. So these people are trying to tell a story that has nothing to do with history.


Religion and corporate slogan۔۔۔

If you listen to the corporate sector and use religion as a slogan, this is a great way to get votes. Ordinary people get caught up in the name of religion and you get money with the help of corporate. Take a look at Electoral Bonds. What was the need to bring it? Companies will now buy electoral bonds and consumers will not know which party the company is funding. These are all tricks and that's what they're doing. Small businesses were affected by measures such as denomination and GST. Large industries were not harmed. Moody's has upgraded India's rating from BAA3 to BAA2 which proves that it has made the private and corporate sector very happy.


Movies against Muslims۔۔۔۔

It is clear that Padmavati is a fictional film but you will see that the Muslims were attacked because of the effect of this film. The way Aladdin Khilji is being portrayed in Padmavati is not historically confirmed. If you had to make a film, there would be so many Rajput kings and queens and if there were many invades between them, you would make them. But you don't want to do that. The controversy over Padmavati shows that the caste system in India is still not abolished. It is being said that this is affecting the 'Rajput dignity'. What is this Rajput Pride? On the one hand you say that caste is to be abolished and on the other hand such things? I see films being made to provoke anti-Muslim sentiment.


Also read : history of ghengis khan

Also read : history of america

Post a Comment

0 Comments